Search This Blog

Thursday, June 15, 2023

BPS Literacy Plan Update-June 2023

In the spring of 2020 a K-12 district-wide committee was formed to create a Bedford Public Schools Literacy Plan.  The plan consisted of five goals that spoke to the needs in the district regarding literacy.  The goals had several action steps that outlined over the span of several years, the actions that needed to be completed to further the plan and complete it.  After three years of implementation the plan is basically completed, with only a few items within goal 4 to be completed during the 2023-2024 school year.  

The BPS Literacy Plan Progress, was shared at the School Committee, on June 13, 2023.  Below is a link to the information that was shared at the School Committee, which consists of the completed items within the plan, and next steps, along with literacy data from grades K-10 for this current school year, 2022-2023.  Many thanks to all of the educators in Bedford who have been instrumental in addressing the Literacy Plan goals, and action steps.

Bedford Public Schools - Literacy Plan Update, June 2013

Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.
Assistant Superintendent

Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Superintendent's Blog
Bedford Public Schools
Curriculum Review Cycle

Generally speaking, one constant in any school district is the ongoing review of curriculum.  This is an important process, and one that we’ve spent a great deal of time examining during the past year.   Last fall, the curriculum leaders within the Bedford Public Schools, collaborated on The Bedford Public Schools Curriculum Review Cycle.  This was an important endeavor, to discuss what the purpose of curriculum review would be, which areas of curriculum would be reviewed, when this process would occur, and who would be involved. 

We created a thoughtful guide on exactly how the curriculum review process will occur in Bedford.  This review cycle process is part of the system’s commitment to thoughtful, continual improvement in the schools.  The review cycle is aligned with the system’s District Improvement Plan and the School Improvement Plans created by each school.  All curriculum development must align with, and be informed by the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks as well as College Board, ACT, and Advanced Placement course content expectations.

Most importantly the review cycle is designed to meet the following needs:

  • A process to support both curriculum changes and instructional improvement.

  • A process which is manageable for elementary teachers who are impacted by changes in many instructional areas.

  • A method for equitable distribution of funding for materials, staff, curriculum work, and professional development.

The need for a curriculum review cycle is clear, as outlined above.  Exactly which areas of the curriculum are examined during a review are listed below:

  • Mathematics

  • Science, Technology and Engineering

  • Visual and Performing Arts

  • Social Studies

  • English, Language Arts, English Language Learning, and Reading

  • Physical Education, Health, and Family and Consumer Sciences

  • World Language

The actual implementation of the curriculum review process is overseen by a Program Administrator, a Program Director, or at the K-5 level a Curriculum Coordinator, who is responsible for managing the review cycle within their content area.  Each curriculum content area has a Curriculum Steering Committee whose membership includes representatives of each school building. Membership includes both teachers and administrators.  The Program Administrator, Program Director, and/or Curriculum Coordinators (or teacher), serve as co-chairs of each steering committee.

The curriculum review cycle generally encompasses a four year span of time. Within the four year span specific steps are taken by the steering committee, in reviewing curriculum, instruction and assessment. This process involves four phases, Introduction, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.  During each phase there are several steps that the committee must undertake to complete the review cycle.

Here in Bedford, we’ve outlined which department will enter the curriculum review process by participating in Phase I.  This  year, as we begin this cycle, we will begin with mathematics.  The mathematics steering committee will be co-chaired by our two math leaders in the district, Anne Pumphrey, K-5 mathematics curriculum coordinator, and Patrick Morrisey, 6-12 mathematics program administrator.  

It's very exciting to begin this important process in Bedford. Learning about best practices and innovative curriculum, assessment, and instructional practices as educators, is vital to creating the best learning environment for all our students.

Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.

Assistant Superintendent

Thursday, January 6, 2022

 Monday, January 3, 2022

Superintendent’s Blog

Bedford Public Schools

Acceleration Road Map at Mid Year

It’s that time of year, when we can take stock not only of the past calendar year, but also where we are at the mid-year point of the school year.  While we are still trying to navigate the challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic, we continue our efforts to focus on student learning.  

Last May, almost at the close of the 2020-21 school year, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education published Acceleration Roadmaps for Teachers and Administrators.  These “Roadmaps” were intended to help educators prepare and to address the varied needs of students as we began to bring all students back into the classroom, after different models of teaching and learning, i.e. hybrid, all remote, all in-person, etc., were implemented during the 2020-21 school year.  The following provides a broad outline as to where we are in Bedford in relation to the three priorities included in both the Teacher and Administrator Acceleration Roadmaps:

Priority 1:  Foster a sense of belonging and partnership among students and families

  • Focusing on student attendance, and ensuring that we are watching carefully to see that students are attending school regularly, and that if students or families need assistance with attendance we provide outreach and support.  

  • In December we sent out a survey to families to gauge student engagement at JGMS and BHS in regards to school based activities.  We will be analyzing the data to understand how students experience inclusion within our activities both academic and athletic.  This will help us understand how we can be more inclusive and more effective in including opportunities for all students to participate.

  • Our Bedford District Improvement Plan, for 2021-2024, outlines specifically, three areas that pertain to fostering a sense of belonging and partnership among students and families, they include a focus on equity, diversity and inclusion, a strong focus on student-centered curriculum instruction and assessment, and continuing to implement programs and a focus on social-emotional learning.  This plan with strategic details embedded, will continue to provide a clear focus and steps for us as a district not only for this year, but for the next few years.

  • We continue to implement many different forms of communication with families, from weekly updates from the superintendent's office, to individual school updates.  The utilization of webinars and virtual platforms like zoom continue to help us communicate with families.  We also continue to focus on making sure that all families can access information vital to understanding what is happening at our schools, this includes providing information in many different languages, and also meeting with families in a variety of formats.

  • Social emotional learning is pivotal as we continue to address the needs of our students.  This year in particular,  we are focusing on professional development in March for teachers at the elementary level on the Responsive Classroom program, which will help us to broaden and reinforce our understanding of creating classrooms where students are engaged and feel supported.  At the middle level, we continue in year two of our implementation of the RULER program to help students understand how they are feeling, and how to help facilitate those emotions with strategies on regulation and agency.  At the high school, with the implementation of the Advisory program, we aim to connect with students in small groups, where conversations can happen organically and in a supportive environment.

Priority 2:  Continuously monitor students’ understanding

  • A major focus within our district during the past three years has been the implementation of the Data Wise process.  By developing and carefully implementing a data system within the district, during the 2019-2020 school year, we were poised to really be able to capture where students were when they entered our schools in September 2020, and again in September of 2021. With the use of assessment calendars in all four buildings, we were able to assess students’ understanding mainly in reading, writing, and mathematics.  We utilized screening tools, to understand the skills of students, and attained concepts.  By analyzing the data as grade level teams, departments and schools, we’ve implemented tiered interventions (RtI) at all levels.  We continue to assess student progress, and will shortly be involved in the second round of “data sweeps” this month, and again at the end of the year, as we did in September. 

  • This year at the elementary level in particular, we developed a “Data Dashboard”. Which was a quick snapshot of a student's skills at the beginning of the year in literacy.  We were able to share this with families at parent/teacher conferences. The objective was to share important information with families, to assess where students are with their learning, and to discuss strategies to help students grow in the coming months.

Priority 3:  Ensure strong grade-appropriate instruction with just-in-time scaffolds when they are needed

  • While last year was challenging, it provided us with a deeper understanding of the importance of implementing standards comprehensively throughout the year-especially in the area of mathematics, where the scope and sequence of concepts and skills is crucial to the building blocks of mathematical understanding.  Much focus is happening throughout the district on providing formative assessments, especially in mathematics, to make sure that students have the understanding they need, before moving on to the next standard.

  • In November our K-5 teachers were able to participate in Reading professional Development with trainers from Columbia Teachers College.  This professional development provided the teachers with the time, and expert knowledge to reinforce all that they’ve been doing while implementing the Units of Study for Reading, at the K-5 level.

  • The department work within the 6-12 continues, and has been refined by the MCAS analysis we were able to do in September.  This work yielded important data for us, and provided us with a roadmap of our own in Bedford in relation to how our students are doing on the state standards in ELA, Math, and Science. 

  • Our instructional practices have also been altered and have strongly been focused on student centered teaching and learning.  Instead of the more traditional teacher-directed approach to instruction, we’ve been working on creating more small group instruction, more time for teachers to engage with students in small groups or individually to check for understanding.  This happens within the reading, writing and math workshop approaches.  This also enables teachers to differentiate their instruction, and for students to display to their teacher their level of understanding in “real-time”.

  • Our focus within our observational work as administrators within the district, has been on understanding and working with teachers on objectives. Clear objectives, guide both the teacher and students, in what students should know and be able to do, as the result of a well crafted lesson.  This has always been important work, and through professional development as a an administrative team, we’re working with a consultant from Research for Better Teacher (RBT), which is also the group that we consult with for our Studying Skillful Teacher course, along with a Differentiation class we offer to all of our faculty members during the summer.

While the Acceleration Roadmaps for Teachers and Administrators, published by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education in spring 2021,  provided important suggestions and guidance for schools in Massachusetts, we were fortunate in many ways in Bedford to already have many processes in place.   

The ongoing focus in Bedford on student learning during the pandemic, as outlined above, is to continue  to make sure that students are receiving what they need in terms of their ability to attend school regularly, understand the curriculum, and also gauge their level of learning through formative assessments and when needed, provide scaffolds.  This is all possible, because of the support that the Bedford community has provided during the past few years.  The families, the school committee, faculty/staff, and administrators, along with the resilient students, have positioned us to continue to hold teaching and learning at the very forefront of the work that we do in the Bedford Public Schools.

Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.
Assistant Superintendent

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Superintendent's Blog

June 16, 2021

BPS Literacy Plan Update

Tricia Clifford, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent of Schools

What a year!  So much has happened in each of our four schools in Bedford, and with each new change, or transition, staff/faculty, parents and students have all been flexible and have done their best to focus on teaching and learning.  I’ve written about the Bedford Public Schools Literacy Plan in the past on this blog, and it’s been discussed at school committee meetings, and within each of the faculty meetings at the schools.  The BPS Literacy Plan was a joint effort among educators throughout the district in the spring of 2020.  It was implemented in the fall of 2020, and now at the end of the 2020-2021 school year, I can provide an update on where we are with the five goals, and the action steps outlined under each of the goals.

Just to review, there are five goals within the Literacy Plan.  Also, there is a Literacy Committee, with membership from each of the schools that meets with me every six weeks.  The purpose of this committee and the bi-monthly meetings, is to check in on where we are with the progress of the action steps, and to also listen, support and problem solve as a committee, all things literacy related.  The five goals that make up the Literacy Plan are as follows:

Goal 1:  Vision/Leadership/Communication

Goal 2:  Assessment

Goal 3:  Intervention Process

Goal 4:  Core curriculum and Instruction

Goal 5:  Professional Development/Coaching

As I stated, each of the goals has a number of action steps outlined that address the goal.  Each of the action steps is generally labeled with being addressed/completed during year 1, 2, or 3 of the plan’s lifespan.  Some of the goals are to be implemented during all three years, while many of them are outlined specifically to be completed in year 1 or 2, etc.  As I reviewed my notes before beginning to write this update, I was impressed with how many of the action steps that were outlined for year 1 of the plan were completed, and how many action steps outlined for year 2 were also completed-during a pandemic, during hybrid learning...kudos to the faculty/staff, students, and families!

Goal 1:  Vision/Leadership/Communication.  An important action step under this goal was to make sure that the Literacy Plan was embedded in School Improvement Plans throughout the district.  This yielded action steps being embedded in what each school did this year, which added consistency and importance to the plan.  We also were able to make sure that funding for programs, including Units of Study for Reading and Writing were supported.  That Fundations (phonics instruction) training will take place, and be implemented with fidelity at the elementary level.  Also that, Orton Gillingham, which is a specialized way to teach reading was provided and that special needs teachers were trained in this approach.  We also have leveraged the expertise of our Literacy Specialists by creating schedules at the elementary level that allow them to work as interventionists at all grade levels, focusing on tiered intervention for students in relation to reading and writing needs. We are also participating in a specially designed workshop for teachers on  “Differentiation” at the end of June from Research for Better Teaching.  This training will help teachers plan and implement lessons and classroom structures that address the different learning needs, and instructional practices that students will need returning from a year of learning during the pandemic.  

Goal 2:  Assessment, We’ve implemented the Data Wise process for the second year.  During the first year of implementing the Data Wise process (as I’ve outlined in this blog previously) the curriculum and administrative leadership group learned about how to use data to inform instruction.  This past year, the actual work of implementing assessments in reading, writing, math, and science was utilized in what we call “assessment sweeps”, where students take assessments, and then we have data meetings where we discuss and analyze the data-and then implement interventions to address student needs.  This process happens regularly at least twice a year, and in some cases three times a year.  

Goal 3:  Intervention Processes.  Within this goal we’ve really been able to examine the RtI (Response to Intervention) structure, looking closely at how we use our faculty/staff to meet student needs, whether in small groups, or one on one, or “push in” to classrooms.  We also made changes to our middle school ELA program, specifically in sixth grade, going from one ELA class for students, to a reading class and a writing class, doubling instructional time at that level on reading and writing.  We also were able to begin to take assessment data and work on ways we can help teachers understand where their students are based on assessment reports.  Also, we are examining ways to share this information with families at parent/teacher conferences during the 2021-2022 school year.

Goal 4:  Core Curriculum and Instruction.  Within this goal we were able to implement at the elementary level strong fidelity to our reading and writing curriculum.  To also potentially implement more training on our phonics program, “Fundations”.  We also have worked on common assessments for writing at the 6-12 level, and at BHS we started the process for school-wide curriculum development and revision of the curriculum, which will be a three year process.  

Goal 5:  Professional Development/Coaching.  This year while so much was new, we were able to implement a lot of newly acquired instructional strategies, which was amazing.  We were able to continue to provide professional development based on individual teacher needs.  A great deal of time was invested in professional development related to “Data Literacy”, learning how to use data to inform instruction, which will continue.  We also, as I stated previously, will  be participating in a workshop for teachers spanning three days in June on “Differentiation” which will help teachers address the various needs of their students, and help to reinforce the workshop model for reading and writing that we are utilizing in several of the grades throughout the district.

This is just a quick update and review of the impact that the BPS Literacy Plan has had within the district during the past year.  As I stated, we were, surprisingly, able to implement many of the year 1 action steps, and year 2 action steps this past year.  We will continue to meet as a Literacy Committee every other month during the 2021-2022 school year, keeping our eyes on the action steps we’ve implemented, and those that we need to implement in the next few years.  As always, thank you to the Bedford families, students and faculty/staff for their continued support and work.


Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.

Assistant Superintendent

Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Superintendent’s Blog

Bedford Public Schools

Data Wise

As we all know, teachers have always used data.  Whether it’s a test, quiz, writing assessment, project or asking students questions to check for understanding, using data has always been an important part of teaching and learning.  By using various forms of data, teachers can get a better understanding if they need to re-teach a concept, present it in a different way, or if our students can move on to a more complex concept, or new material.  

Within the realm of data and its use in informing instruction, a lot has been researched, and learned over the past few years.  The work by Boudette, City and Murnane in their book, Data Wise:  A Step-by-Step Guide to Using Assessment Results to Improve Teaching and Learning (2013), from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, is in many ways a very clear outline as to how and why schools should use data to inform our instruction.  In September of 2019 here in Bedford, as a K-12 curriculum leadership team (program administrators, program directors, principals, central office administrators, and curriculum coordinators) we began the work of diving into the “Data Wise” process.  

The first part of our process was to look closely at our District-Wide Strategic Objects, which outline several objectives all of which connect closely to the Data Wise work, but the one we focused on most in relation to this work was :

“Collaborative Professional Culture:  Nurture a professional culture that maximizes administrator and teaching learning, innovative and creativity by creating authentic opportunities for collaborative work that is informed by shared goal-setting, and analysis of student work and achievement data.”

The Data Wise process itself presents a clear and carefully tested blueprint for school leaders.  It shows how examining text scores and other classroom data (other classroom data is equally as important as standardized tests, if not more important) can become a catalyst for important schoolwide conversations that will enhance schools’ abilities to capture teachers’ knowledge, foster collaboration, identify obstacles to change, and enhance school culture and climate.

As a K-12 curriculum leadership team, we focused on improving teaching and learning by using data structures to discuss, and create meaningful assessments, to form teams to gather the data, analyze the data and inform our teaching, and continue to do this as an ongoing process.  During our work as a K-12 curriculum leadership team we focused on preparing for this work in September 2019, which included reading the first chapters of Data Wise, and continued in November with learning about how to look at data and inquiring within our schools.  In February we began to dig into ways we could act and create data structures to help inform instruction, and in April we began to set up the structure that we would implement during the 2020-21 school year.  Finishing up the year, having read, discussed and implemented, Data Wise:  A Step-by-Step Guide to Using Assessment Results to Improve Teaching and Learning (2013).

We were fortunate in many ways in regard to timing. As we began this process of learning about systemic ways to use data within the K-12 landscape in Bedford to inform our instruction, we had no idea how important it would be to have these structures in place.  When the pandemic occurred in March of 2020, we pivoted to remote learning, and then in the fall of 2020 began our hybrid and all remote models.  I can’t say how appreciative and impressed I have been with the implementation of the data work during the school year.  It was vital that we have a data system in place during the past year.  

In September and October we were able to take baseline data in literacy and math, to find out where students were within their learning and understanding of grade level standards, K-12.  In the fall after those assessments were completed we met at grade levels throughout the district to analyze the student data and create plans to adjust our curriculum and instruction, and to provide Rti (Response to Intervention) support to students.  During January and February, we as a system, again utilized student assessments to capture students’ understanding and learning during the several months they were in school.  We continued the process of analysis and intervention.  This spring we will do this again, and I believe, will be able to see that with the use of the Data Wise system, we have been able to adjust our teaching to help students make progress that is meaningful and will help them bridge what has been a difficult year, to September 2021.  

Without the ability to utilize a K-12 data system to capture what students know and are able to do, in relation to their learning, it would have been difficult this school year to understand how much learning might have been lost during the pandemic, how we could adjust our teaching to address learning gaps, or loss during the 2020-21 school year, and where we need to focus coming into the fall of 2021.  Again, I want to thank the faculty and staff in Bedford, for their dedication to making this system be meaningful for our students, and also I want to thank the students for persevering and doing their best.  We will continue to utilize the Data Wise system as we move forward in the coming years.  The goal over time is to learn from students how our teaching can be improved to meet their needs, and help them reach their fullest potential.

Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.
Assistant Superintendent

Tuesday, December 22, 2020

Superintendent's Blog 

December 2020

Bedford Public Schools 

Literacy Plan

In January 2020, the Bedford Public Schools began the process of assembling a team of faculty to create a Literacy Plan for the district.  One of the main forces behind creating a plan, was to address the concerns highlighted by our standardized test scores, specifically MCAS results for the past few years.  When we called for faculty members to join a committee to create a plan, we were excited to have over thirty members of our faculty step forward and embark on addressing the issues and concerns related to literacy in our district.  This effort was led by Andrea Salipante, K-5 Literacy Specialist, Jennifer Rabold,6-12 Reading Program Administrator, and me.  We were fortunate to have members from each school.  Through the late winter and early spring, the committee formed sub committees to investigate specific issues and to gather information from faculty and staff throughout the district.  

Based on information gathered by each of the subcommittees, we were able to focus our plan on five specific goals, with action steps to be addressed over the span of the next three years.  Each of the schools has embedded the BPS Literacy Plan into their School Improvement Plans.

The BPS Literacy Plan has been presented to all of the faculty and staff this past fall, at building based meetings, and has been presented to the school committee.  We look to presenting it at various parent groups this spring, and next year, either in person or via zoom.  The following information highlights the vision of the plan, the purpose, the belief and assumptions behind the plan and the five specific goals:

BPS Literacy Plan Vision Statement

Bedford Public Schools is committed to making literacy a priority.  We believe that through quality tiered literacy instruction, our students will be prepared for college and career and life beyond Bedford Public Schools.  We want all of our students to have the skills to become literate citizens and pursue their dreams when they graduate from high school.

The Purpose of the BPS Literacy Plan

  • To inform instructional leaders and teachers about current, researched best practices for reading assessment, instruction, and intervention.

  • To develop a comprehensive, system-wide plan for literacy assessment, instruction, curriculum, and intervention, including a literacy scope and sequence that builds on students’ skills as they develop K-12.

  • To address the unique considerations necessary to bridge the gap between students’ current literacy abilities and grade-level expectations by accelerating learning.

  • To inform the professional development goals and needs of the district in the area of literacy.

  • To inform the development and implementation of curriculum for specific courses, programs, and differentiated plans of instruction and intervention.

The Beliefs and Assumptions that Underlie the Development of the BPS Literacy Plan

  • Students that are significantly behind their peers in grade-level reading achievement need:

    • An intervention plan that will accelerate their literacy growth.

    • Additional support above and beyond reading in language arts and other content areas.

    • Instruction from a licensed reading professional during time specified for reading instruction. 

    • Intervention in addition to other services such as special education or ESL.

  • Students reading at or above grade level will also benefit from explicit reading instruction to encourage ongoing growth and development of critical thinking skills.
  • An instruction and intervention plan should be data driven and based on students’ needs to assure growth in reading development and to support the independent application of strategic reading throughout the school day.

  • Triangulation of multiple data measures which includes norm-referenced, criterion-based, and informal assessments should be used to create or redesign reading intervention plans and for moving students into, between, and out of appropriate interventions.

BPS Literacy Plan Goals

  • Goal 1: Vision/Leadership/Communication

  • District and school-based initiatives and goals will be aligned to the Literacy Plan, including the alignment of K-12 literacy curricula.

  • Goal 2: Assessment

  • Consistent administration of literacy assessments will be conducted at every grade level throughout the year; data will be shared across schools, grade levels, and district; and data will be used to inform instruction and intervention.

  • Goal 3: Intervention Processes

  • Consistency and alignment of literacy interventions K-12, including processes for identifying students, informing stakeholders, and delivering interventions, will be strengthened.

  • Goal 4: Core Curriculum and Instruction

  • Core, Tier I literacy instruction will be strengthened and differentiated so as to reduce the need for literacy interventions.

  • Goal 5: Professional Development/Coaching

  • Appropriate and sufficient professional development and coaching will be provided for all staff who are providing and evaluating literacy instruction.

As you can see from the information presented here, a great deal of time, thought, collaboration and effort went into creating this plan-which will be a road map for the district for the next three years. The global pandemic has impacted education everywhere-we are fortunate in Bedford to have educators who have continued to implement the BPS Literacy Plan, even in the face of altered educational models.  The Literacy Plan Committee (a small group of approximately 2 representatives from each school) meet monthly to discuss the implementation of the plan-to check in on the progress of the goals and the action steps aligned with those goals.  We are making progress, and we will continue to address the action steps in the next few years, and support Literacy throughout the district. Periodically, I, along with the Literacy Plan Committee, will be updating the faculty at each school and the school committee as the action steps are addressed.  If you would like to read the BPS Literacy Plan in its entirety please click on this link:   Bedford Literacy Plan

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me-best wishes for 20201!


Tricia Clifford, Ed. D.

Assistant Superintendent

Friday, February 7, 2020

BPS Literacy Planning Committee 2020

BPS Literacy Planning Committee 2020

The Bedford Public Schools is committed to making literacy a priority. With that as our shared commitment, we have created a Literacy Planning Committee that has representation from K-12 faculty from all content areas. The committee will work on creating a literacy plan that represents a continuum of instruction, curriculum, assessment, and intervention services for our students K-12.

Our MCAS scores have demonstrated that we have made some progress, yet we still have room for improvement. Several different cohorts have made gains; however, our students are not performing at the levels we would like them too. At no grade, and in no subject tested, did we have greater than 81% of our students Meeting or Exceeding Expectations in 2019. Some grade levels and subjects, such as Grade 7 ELA (YOG 2024), where only 60% of students are Meeting or Exceeding Expectations, are even more concerning. Furthermore, there are significant gaps in the achievement and growth percentiles between students in several subgroups and all students.

In addition to addressing our assessment data, as the literacy demands of learners continue to increase, it is imperative that we develop assessment and intervention plans (including a scope and sequence of developmental outcomes) that lead all students to acquire the literacy skills necessary for the 21st century. With this in mind, we will develop a literacy plan that will serve a variety of purposes:

     To inform instructional leaders and teachers about current, researched best practices for literacy assessment, instruction, and intervention.
     To develop a comprehensive, system-wide plan for literacy assessment, instruction, curriculum, and intervention, including a literacy scope and sequence that builds on students’ skills as they develop K-12.
     To address the unique considerations necessary to bridge the gap between students’ current literacy abilities and grade-level expectations by accelerating learning.
     To inform the professional development goals and needs of the district in the area of literacy.
     To inform the development and implementation of curriculum for specific courses, programs, and differentiated plans of instruction and intervention.

We have 29 Bedford educators that have joined our Literacy Planning Committee. This skilled group in collaboration with many stakeholders will create a district plan that ensures that ALL students in the Bedford Public receive appropriate literacy instruction to prepare them for college and career and life beyond Bedford Public Schools. The committee will work with subgroups  throughout the district on the following categories:

            ● K-5 Core Literacy Instruction
            ● 6-12 Core Literacy Instruction
            ● Literacy Intervention Program
            ● Literacy Assessments and Use of Data
            ● Literacy Professional Development
            ● Resources, Funding, and Staffing
            ● Literacy Leadership and District Structures Supporting Literacy
            ● Scheduling and Grouping

The committee will be meeting several times throughout the spring. The goal will be to share the Literacy Plan at the end of August, and have this plan become an integral part of the overall district plan and each individual school-based School Improvement Plan. The committee will meet for their first meeting, on Friday, January 31st. This is a very exciting time for teaching and learning in Bedford. The response to creating a Literacy Plan, and implementing it collaboratively as K-12 system, has been enthusiastic and well supported. Look for updates as we begin to finalize a comprehensive plan.

Tricia Clifford, Ed.D
Assistant Superintendent of Schools